Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kyle Edmund vs James Ward Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Edmund vs Ward analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Edmund vs James Ward Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Edmund 0 - 1 Ward
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Edmund has won 52.4% of points on their second serve, while Ward has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Edmund, in recent form, has won 51.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ward has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.72% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Edmund has saved 59.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ward has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Edmund has won 60.47% of matches played (W/L 26/ 17), with Ward winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 55/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 15/ 27). Ward has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 219/ 173), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 46/ 60).
- Player level: In the last year, Edmund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.27% of matches (W/L 17/ 5), where as Ward has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Edmund winning 0 times and Ward being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Edmund winning 0 and Ward winning 2. The last match between Edmund and Ward was at the Sarasota Challenger, 16-04-2013, First, Clay with James Ward getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Edmund and Ward have played a deciding set 0 times, with Edmund winning 0 times and Ward 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Edmund winning 0, and Ward 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Edmund has played against opponents with an average rank of 314.63 while Ward has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Edmund has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ward has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Edmund has converted 39.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ward has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
478
Rank
14
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
89
High
37
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
61% (336-216)
Career Total W/L
52% (402-374)
59% (19-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,623,010
Career Prize Money
$460,450
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Kyle Edmund vs James Ward For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Edmund VS Ward
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Kyle Edmund | James Ward |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:6 | 1:17:6 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (29/53) | 58% (41/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (21/29) | 68% (28/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (8/24) | 50% (15/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (28/71) | 45% (24/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
James Ward
Player
Kyle Edmund
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kyle Edmund | James Ward |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (19/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (44/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (386/347) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 136 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 102 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:4 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 347.94 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1314/2251) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (951/1314) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (491/937) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (87/219) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (872/2263) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 91% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (19/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (21/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Kyle Edmund
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Kyle Edmund
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Ryan Peniston
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Kyle Edmund
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Keenan Mayo
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
James Ward Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
James Ward
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Ward
Player
Illya Marchenko
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
17
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
James Ward
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vasek Pospisil
Player
James Ward
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
James Ward
45%
(
33 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Ward
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
James Ward
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
76%
(
22 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin King
Player
James Ward
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Edmund Vs Ward Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Edmund are available here and Ward photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
